人間の本性は悪なのか? #477
Episode 477 of Yuru Linguistics Radio (Yuru Gengogaku Radio) uses the book On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society as a starting point to examine why only 15-20% of American soldiers actually fired their weapons in World War II, and why that rate jumped to over 90% in the Vietnam War. In the second half, the hosts connect this psychology of "killing distance" to modern drone strikes and social media harassment, drawing on commentary from photography critic Ken Oyama (Oyama Ken).
Listen to this episode Go to the show page
What this episode answers
Why didn't World War II soldiers fire at the enemy?
Data shows many soldiers deliberately did not fire at the enemy, and those who didn't fire weren't fleeing but took on more dangerous tasks like rescuing the wounded or carrying ammunition, revealing a strong psychological resistance to killing one's own kind rather than confirming that human nature is violent.
What does the data showing that 90% of guns recovered from the Gettysburg battlefield had never been fired actually mean?
It means that, contrary to the assumption that humans are naturally violent, most soldiers never fired their weapons in battle, showing a strong innate psychological resistance to killing others of one's own kind.
How does the distance between a weapon and its target affect the psychological resistance to killing?
The closer the distance to the person being killed, the greater the psychological burden, while the farther away, the smaller the burden; this is why long weapons like spears or sarissas let soldiers distance themselves psychologically, mid-range weapons like rifles remove the enemy's face and voice, and long-range weapons like missiles or aerial bombing make psychological trauma even less likely.
Why did the firing rate among American soldiers jump to over 90% during the Vietnam War?
It was due to Pavlovian conditioning training that shifted from shooting round targets to instantly appearing and falling human-shaped pop-up targets with immediate reward for hits and punishment for misses, conditioning soldiers to fire reflexively before conscious thought.
What structural similarity exists between drone strikes and social media harassment?
Both drone operators and people harassing others on social media can act from a distance without the target's face or voice reaching them, then return to ordinary daily life (drinking, family time) afterward, similar to how abuse hurled anonymously through a screen would be exhausting to deliver face-to-face.
The strange data on soldiers who wouldn't shoot
Of the 27,575 muskets recovered from the Gettysburg battlefield, 90% were still loaded — meaning they had never been fired. Similar reports exist from the Napoleonic Wars, where soldiers deliberately missed their targets: given the firing rates of the era, units should theoretically have been able to kill 100 people, but in practice only 1-2 people were killed per minute. Even in World War II, the firing rate among American riflemen was only 15-20%. The soldiers who didn't fire weren't fleeing — they willingly took on tasks more dangerous than shooting, such as rescuing the wounded or carrying ammunition. Fukai (Fukai) introduced this data, arguing that, contrary to the common belief that "human nature is violent," it actually reveals a strong psychological resistance to killing one's own kind.
How distance creates the inability to kill
According to the book, the closer the distance to the person being killed, the greater the psychological burden; the farther away, the smaller the burden. One theory holds that spears remained in use longer than swords or blades through the Middle Ages not simply because of their length advantage, but because they created enough distance for a soldier to tell himself he was "sweeping," not "stabbing." The long spears (sarissas) of Macedonian heavy infantry can be interpreted the same way. With mid-range weapons like rifles, the enemy's facial expressions and voice no longer reach the shooter, and with long-range weapons like missiles and aerial bombing, psychological trauma becomes even less likely. Data was also introduced showing that sailors, compared to ground troops who kill by their own hand directly, are less prone to mental illness.
The Vietnam War and the conditioning-driven surge in firing rates
The reason the firing rate among American soldiers jumped to over 90% during the Vietnam War was Pavlovian conditioning training. Training shifted from leisurely shooting at round targets to human-shaped pop-up targets that appeared and fell in an instant, with immediate rewards for hits and punishment for misses, building the ability to fire reflexively before conscious thought. As a result, while it took an average of 50,000 rounds of ammunition to kill a single enemy soldier in Vietnam overall, snipers who had undergone this conditioning training killed with an average of just 1.39 rounds. But a war with a thin sense of just cause, anti-war sentiment upon returning home, and experiences of guerrilla warfare that involved civilians combined to leave many returning veterans suffering from PTSD.
The shared structure of drone strikes and social media harassment
Modern remote weapons like drones share the same structure. According to The Philosophy of Drones (Drone no Tetsugaku), drone operators live in cities, and after work they go out for a drink and spend time with their families like anyone else. Fukai likened this to social media harassment. As photography critic Ken Oyama (Oyama Ken) has pointed out, abuse that would be exhausting to deliver face-to-face can be hurled one-sidedly through a smartphone screen, where the other person's face is invisible. Horimoto (Horimoto) cited examples of people who don't change their attitude in person even toward those they've criticized — such as the episode where he directly told QuizKnock graduate Ko-chan (Kochan) about criticism of him in person, and the story of Kominehizumi, a critic of "as-if humanism," who showed up alone at a Loft event.
Takeaways
- In World War II, only 15-20% of soldiers fired their weapons, showing that most displayed strong resistance to killing their own kind.
- Psychological resistance to killing is shaped by distance, and weapons like spears and rifles have reduced that resistance by putting distance between soldiers and their targets.
- The Vietnam War used conditioning training to push the firing rate above 90%, but this came at the cost of increased psychological trauma among returning veterans.
This article is edited from a machine transcript of the first 30 minutes of the episode. It is not an official summary — please listen to the episode itself.